Radical Critique
The radical critique is a branch of philology. It examines the origins and sources of text. The radical critique applies to all "founding texts, whether the Iliad or the Odyssey , the Bible , the Koran or the Dao De Jing attributed to Lao Zi. In the West, this work enjoyed a certain notoriety because of the theological-political consequences it had on Western Christianity.
The radical critique focuses particularly on the sources that contributed to the document and determines who was the author, date and place of composition of the text. It also looks to external sources of texts Criticism of sources and radical critique of the Bible Originally, the radical critique was referring to the practice of a group of biblical scholars in Germany serving in Tbingen , including: which began in the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century to analyze historical archives of the Middle East in the first century of the common era and time Bible of the Old Testament , looking for confirmation independent of the events recounted in the Bible. Their intellectual genealogy lies in Locke , Hume , Kant , Lessing , Fichte , Hegel , and the rationalist French. These ideas, developed in Germany by Graf and Wellhausen , traveled to England with Coleridge and more with English translations by George Eliot in the life of Jesus by Strauss ( 1846 ) and Feuerbach's Essence of Christianity ( 1854 ). The Life of Jesus ( 1863 ) by Ernest Renan ( 1823 - 1892 ), continued the same tradition. Three years before the publication of the Life of Jesus, liberal theologians Anglicans began the process of integration of this critical history in the field of Christian doctrine in Essays and Reviews ( 1860 ). In Catholicism , The Gospel and the Church ( 1902 ) by Alfred Loisy designed to refute the Essence of Christianity, a lecture published by Adolph von Harnack , less inspired than Renan, revealed to the public the modernist crisis ( 1902 - 1961 ). With the work of scientists or theologians as Rudolf Bultmann , the radical critique of the Bible has been used for "demythologize. This type of work is perceived as a threat by some branches of Christianity's most traditional and recent trends Judaism who read the Bible in the historical foundations of Israel. Among Catholics, Pope Leo XIII condemned the "errors of rationalism and the radical critique" in the encyclical Deus Providentissimus of 1893 , which will allow Merry del Val to excommunicate Alfred Loisy. Pope Pius X denounced him, the radical critique in his apostolic constitution Lamentabili. Some fundamentalists , in Protestantism and Judaism, decreed that a radical critique is heretical because they claim that the Bible is the word of God instilled in the patriarchs, prophets and apostles. Jewish academics and liberal Christians responded by stating that belief in God has nothing to do with the belief that a text, namely the Bible or the Gospels , has more a writer. Moreover, they emphasize the circular reasoning that is to use biblical statements to "prove" the authenticity or historicity of the Bible. We first highlight the ambiguity of the term critical means both: For the former, see the feature article, critic of Islam. The current section of this article is only interested in aspects of philosophical, historical, theological set. Apart from the traditional criticism or canonical exegesis , the radical critique of the origins of Islam and the genealogy of the Quran begins in the late nineteenth century but it is outside the circle of scholars with the 1977 publication of work of John Wansbrough as the Quranic studies and The Sectarian Milieu ; his theory that later called "the deconstructionist school" or "hypercritical" states that the Qur'an is the compilation of a series of logia. This line is, mutatis mutandis, that followed by Youssef Seddik , the axis of criticism: With refinement of study and reflection, school philological theories developed with researchers such as Gerd Puin , Manfred Kropp who will work on biblical sources of the Qur'an ( Old and New Testament ). In particular, Manfred Kropp assistant to his field of study of epigraphy Nabataean , Aramaic , Ge'ez and Arabic , this led him to raise the possibility of entering the Koran texts from a bible Ethiopia, the existence of a proto-Quran as suggested by the study of inscriptions engraved on the inside of the dome of the Mosque of Omar . He understands that this text, which differs from the version of the Vulgate uthmanienne on semantic and grammatical points, from a text sufficiently official to have been carved into the dome. The historical-critical exegesis of the Koran came out in public with two events: School Semitic rhetoric, represented by Michel Cuypers pfj, University of Leuven, working on the comparison between the structure of narratives of Bible and the Koran. The only reservation that he has found so far deals with the methodology relied heavily on the retroversion (as regards the Bible). Convictions dogmatic method of radical
Origins of Islam and the Koran
References
Bibliography
about Christianity
on the Koran
See also
External Links
